
Top stories




But that feeling is exactly what scammers and sometimes even well-intentioned employees rely on.
As more brands extend their presence onto social platforms, the line between legitimate digital commerce and sophisticated threat activity has become increasingly blurred. Based on over 100 real-world investigations into brand misuse and online fraud, here are five dangers consumers need to understand before shopping through social media and how to recognise them early.
One of the most overlooked online threats does not come from obvious scammers, but from genuine employees operating outside company policy.
In multiple cases, employees attempted to 'help' customers by advertising products on their personal Facebook profiles or Marketplace listings, often to meet sales targets or attract new clients. While the intent may not always be malicious, the risk is very real.
Typically, these employees:
The danger lies in the process. Once the interaction moves outside official, monitored systems, customers are exposed to serious data and financial risk.
In one investigation, a customer received a call from a number identified as a Beares store landline, which created immediate trust. However, the number differed from the officially published contact details, and the entire sales process had already taken place through unauthorised channels. Personal information was being requested outside of approved systems, creating clear data-protection concerns.
Legitimacy is being borrowed, not earned. A real store number can make an unsafe process seem secure, but if the journey started outside official channels, the risk remains.
Fake brand pages are one of the fastest-growing social media threats. Pages with names like 'Beares SA Fans' or 'Best Home & Electric Fans' closely mimic official brand pages. They reuse logos, product imagery, and campaign visuals to build immediate trust.
The most common hook is the fake giveaway.
In a typical case:
This tactic spreads rapidly, as it exploits excitement, urgency, and social proof. Even when these pages are removed, the same operators often recreate them under new names, repeating the cycle.
My thoughts: If a 'giveaway' requires rapid sharing into multiple groups to qualify, it isn’t a promotion, it's a distribution strategy for a scam.
Products are rarely the end goal. Your personal information is. Across numerous investigations, both scammers and non-compliant employees requested:
These requests almost always occurred on unsecured platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, or third-party survey links.
In one case, a customer was asked to submit ID documents and bank statements via WhatsApp to 'apply for credit'. That data could easily be reused for identity theft, fraudulent credit applications, or sold on criminal marketplaces.
This behaviour not only exposes consumers to serious harm, but also violates data-protection regulations such as the POPI Act, which exists specifically to prevent personal information from being handled in this way.
My thoughts: Ravenwatch is well positioned to assist small, medium and large companies.
Examples include:
Legitimate businesses do not accept payments into individual accounts. Yet this tactic is repeatedly used by scammers and, in some cases, employees acting outside policy. In one case, a scammer refused to provide an invoice until payment was received. In another, a confirmed employee shared personal banking details over WhatsApp to secure a sale.
Personal bank account = personal risk. Once money leaves official systems, consumer protection ends.
The most sophisticated threat is not a single tactic, but a combination of them. Scammers and rogue employees increasingly create a grey area by mixing:
In one investigation, a Marketplace ad led a customer to WhatsApp, then to a fraudulent credit application before a call arrived from a real store landline to legitimise the process. In another, a confirmed employee collaborated with an external individual to route customers from unofficial ads into the store. This blending of real and fake makes verification extremely difficult for consumers.
Social media has become an informal storefront.
Facebook Marketplace, community groups, and DMs now sit alongside official e-commerce channels. But after reviewing over 100 real brand-protection investigations, one thing is clear: The biggest risk isn’t always scammers; it’s blurred boundaries.
What we’re seeing:
Well-intentioned staff often post catalogues on personal profiles or move customers to WhatsApp to 'help'. The moment this happens, official safeguards disappear. Customers assume legitimacy, but the process is no longer secure.
Cloned brand pages run fake giveaways to harvest engagement and data. Even when taken down, they reappear under new names. The goal isn’t the prize; it’s reach and trust.
Payslips, IDs, bank statements are routinely requested via WhatsApp or third-party forms. Once shared, that data is outside compliance, outside audit, and outside consumer protection.
Whether it’s a scammer or a rogue employee, payment to a personal account is a hard stop. Legitimate businesses don’t operate this way.
The most convincing fraud mixes unofficial activity with real brand assets: a store landline, a genuine logo, a familiar name. One legitimate touchpoint is often enough to disarm scepticism.
This isn’t just a fraud issue. It’s a governance issue.
Today, brand trust is shaped as much by internal behaviour as external threats. If customers can’t clearly tell where official engagement begins and ends, risk fills the gap.
Trust the process-not the DM. Contact Ravenwatch by Offernet for an obligation-free report on your brand for your SME.